Archive for the ‘Polls’ Category

Star Tribune poll reveals apparent contradictions in MN Senate Race

Monday, October 1st, 2007

I’ll be doing some additional digging later into the poll but chew onstribpoll1 this in the meantime:

Despite 52% of Minnesotans having a favorable impression of Senator Coleman only 45% approve of the job he’s doing.

I’ll explain the apparent contradiction after I whip some graphics up.

Franken and Ciresi both within striking distance of Coleman - MN Senate Race 2008

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

According to the new Survey USA poll (hat tip to MNCR).

Key points:

  • The difference is within the margin of error (MOE).Remember: the MOE applies to both statistics. So if Coleman is at 49% and Franken at 42% with MOE +/- 4%, the true values might have Franken at 46% and Coleman at 45%.

  • Coleman is getting 15% of his total support from Democrats! No, this isn’t a sign of Democrats rejecting Franken - even against Ciresi the numbers are almost identical.Did I say identical?I meant to say that Franken gets more Democrat, Republican and Independent voters than Ciresi does against Coleman. That’s what we call a “non-issue”. Zing Brodkorb!This is the soft underside to Coleman’s support level, which is already slipping. Once the campaign begins in earnest, that 15% is going to slowly fade away…
  • Moderates support both Democrats over Coleman Brodkorb at Minnesota Democrats Exposed wrote, in reference to this survey, that Franken has said things that would make a “goat sick”. I guess there aren’t too many sensitive goats among Minnesotan moderates.
  • Coleman also loses to the Democrats with:
      • Women
        • 65 year olds and over
          • Registered Democrats! (Yes, this matters, since Democrats comprise 11% more of the registered electorate over Republicans). Woot!

          I’ll whip up some visual aids later. I’ve got to get downtown…more on this later.

Election Closers

Monday, November 6th, 2006

The only thing that matters on Election Day are the people who actually make it to the polls. Pollsters use modifications to their selection methods to obtain a population that is likely to vote. In 2004, these methods were far from perfect.

It was my experience two years ago that gave me a permanent cynicism toward any prognostications based on polls, whether they be positive or negative. Simply put, Democrats were unable to close.

Here are quick closers to use:

  • CD1: Gutknecht admitted he didn’t know how bad Iraq had gotten. Gutknecht abdicated his oversight responsibility and does not deserve re-election.
  • CD2: When Murtha said we should increase troop levels in Iraq or get out, Kline blasted him for telling the truth. Kline has an excellent military record but has forgotten the first rule of war: go hard or go home. Kline supported an unrealistic war plan and now it’s time for him to go home.
  • CD6: Bachmann has showed disdain for the entire concept of rational thought. On Iraq, when WCCO asked Bachmann what the strategy should be she gave a meaningless sound-bite as an answer. Our troops deserve more and Bachmann’s lack of strategy would endanger lives.
  • Gov: While the Governor cannot directly change the Iraq policy, Pawlenty has said he would still support Bush even if his approval rating fell to 2%. That betrays a dangerous fanaticism and ignorance of reality.

Iraq has supplanted terrorism as the main issue driving the election. Believe it or not, but the most common reason given by moderates and independents for voting Republican was “we need to fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them at home.” That patently false propoganda has fallen apart.

In every competitive race, the Minnesotan Republican candidates have proven themselves unsuitable for public office due to their support for the administration’s Iraq policy. As you urge your family, friends or perfect strangers to vote tomorrow, remind them of these closers.

MN Poll: Senate race still blowout, governorship statistical toss-up

Sunday, November 5th, 2006

According to the poll, Klobuchar hold a 20-point lead over Kennedy. Hatch is only 5-points ahead of Pawlenty, within the margin of error.

Some interesting hits from the poll’s breakdown:

Senate 

  • By a 2-1 ratio, ads have made voters support Klobuchar over Kennedy. Kennedy’s ad-man Scott Howell has lost his touch.
  • Klobuchar wins most age demographics, especially 65 and over, where she leads Kennedy by 38-points. The exception is 35-44 year olds which Kennedy takes by six.
  • Kennedy has more support among individuals with an income between $75k - $90k, but Klobuchar has more support among the $100k+ crowd.  Who says the rich are anti-Democrat?

Governor

  • Pawlenty keeps close to Hatch in the first two education demographics, but college graduates pull more from Pawlenty by a margin of 9-points.
  • Economic breakdown is clear in this race.  Hatch takes those making under $75k, Pawlenty takes those who make more.
  • Hatch wins the health care vote, Pawlenty the tax vote.  No surprise.
  • Ads have been a bit of a wash in this race.  Interesting, all I feel is dirty after watching the negative ads in this race.

This tells us little about the “gaffe” effect in the Governor race, as the majority of respondents were interviewed beforehand.

I’ll link to MNCR’s trend lines as soon as he has them up.

Leaked Poll in the 5th CD

Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006

Minvovled has just put out a new poll of the DFL Primary race in the 5th CD.

It came from three separate sources, so the poll itself is probably legitimate.  The results make it clear the race is still in play, but not much else. This probably a good time to keep in mind that even the “likely voter” model has its failings.

If you missed Mark Blumenthal’s authoritative series on the likely voter model in 2004 you can find it here.  Mark’s blog, Mystery Pollster, is a required read for anyone who wants to interpret poll results.

Mike Hatch’s Democratic Deficit

Wednesday, August 9th, 2006

Minvovled, MN Publius and MN Campaign Report have been debating the effectiveness of Mike Hatch’s campaign for Governor in light of a new Strib article on the race. The thread, in chronological order is here: Minvovled, MN Publius, MNCR and Minvolved’s response to MN Publius.

Given the variances of psephology, the debate has been extremely well informed and civil.

However, the most important feature of this race has not yet been discussed openly since the original Strib article was released. Hatch has not yet sealed the deal with Democratic voters.

In the Rasmussen subtotals, Hatch is only polling at 68% of Democrats. 6% are going to Hutchinson, with 12% undecided. Contrast this with Pawlenty earning 85% of Republicans. Rasmussen argues that Democrat voters usually come around by election day. However, they do not put this into the context of Hatch’s favorability numbers trending downwards (-6%).

If Hatch was still polling high among Democrats, I would readily agree that Hatch has played his summer correctly and can begin his campaign in earnest after Labor Day.

Summer is more about developing your own grassroots base than it is about direct voter contact. Volunteers are busy people and they make their time commitments early in the season. If your volunteer recruitment is not high in the summer, you risk losing volunteers to other candidates or other causes. A handicapped volunteer operation in the fall could be fatal in a race that will be decided by the Democratic base.

It has been said that the blogs should stop complaining and start doing. Such an argument misses the point: Jeff from Minvovled, Matt from MN Publius, MNCR and I are all the type of people who will go to a candidate’s office without being asked and phone bank on our cell phones in a broom closet. If voters with our political profile are not being asked to volunteer every weekend, the question stands: who is being asked?

Throughout the month, I will be investigating the cause of Hatch’s Democratic deficit.

  • Is it messaging?
  • The media? Their refusal to pick up on Hatch’s avuncular side?
  • Field operations?

Rasmussen: Amy up by 12!

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

[UPDATED]

I have heard a rumor that new Rasmussen poll will show Klobuchar at 50 and Kennedy at 38
.

Kos verifies the poll data.
The same story also alleges that KvM heard the same rumor fact, posted on it, then deleted the post. I guess if you don’t have anything nice to say…

Flash verifies the KvM post removal.

Joementum is debunked by Q-Poll

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

In the biggest reversal of a “physical force” since the cosmological constant was proven false and then re-proven to be almost true, the latest Q-Poll shows Ned Lamont with a double-digit lead over Senator Joe Lieberman:

Lamont, a political novice, had support from 54 percent of likely Democratic voters in the Quinnipiac University poll, while Lieberman, now in his third term, had support from 41 percent of voters. The sampling error margin was plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Interesting, but off topic?  Hardly.  The Lamont-Lieberman race is a clear contrast between two radically different methods of communication.  Expect an update discussing the difference later today.